The other day I read with interest a Diario de Navarra page analyzing the failure of Joseph Antonio Camacho as coach of Osasuna. Among other things, the journalist, JM Esparza, summarized and put clear comments, more discreet, had already been surfacing these past years in the local media.
Camacho journalist accused of being a bum in Pamplona. The de Cieza came with many names, but players soon found to their amazement that the parties did not prepare, did not give instructions directly to strategy and requested them to organize themselves into the field. "You are professionals and know what you must do," she said. Camacho was installed with such an environment of laziness in training and preparation of the parties that at the end of first season all the players and asked the president to throw it.
do not know if things happened exactly. So now I'm not buff enough to have followed the matter in detail. But I am very interested in history. First, as an example, very likely, the phenomenon of imposture, the gap between public perception and actual performance of many private and notorious characters.
Not to leave the field of sport and to remember botepronto two somewhat extreme examples. In a film always interesting Mario Camus, The old music, a basketball coach with an outstanding reputation in leagues course reaches U.S. direct Lugo local team, and his deputy, his deputy, soon discovers that it is actually a guy who has no idea how to train, we are facing a man who, under his seriousness and poise hides a complete ignorance of basketball. More recently, another film, Damned United , tells the story of a brilliant career coach until, without the crucial support of his second, he has enough of him, terrified that includes also lacks any clear idea about what should do with the Leed United, and fails with a crash. Osasuna clear that the assistant's contribution has not been so: the second Camacho, Pepe prison, has been even more vague and jacarandoso reputation the Murcia.
Camacho's episode is another aspect that interests me most. Camacho was a great lateral young worker, bully, sure, but his career as a coach, a very promising beginning, the year draws to a steep downhill, a decline that seems unstoppable.
How many people I know will not undergoing an evolution similar to that of Camacho, en route to versions of itself progressively worse? How many people are not less as the years pass? Leaving aside the inevitable physical decline, how many people had, or seemed at least more life force of younger, more daring, more curiosity, more interest and more eager to do things?
0 comments:
Post a Comment